![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 6 of 6. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by john berk on November 12, 2005, at 7:48:10
Hi Everyone,
i have just begun taking a micro-nutrient that is being touted as the next big thing in alternative health.it is supposed to increase energy, help with depression and help with arthritis, among many other things!! it actually helps zinc and many other important nutrients in the body be better assimilated!! also, increase strength for body-builders by helping release growth hormone!!
it is called the "silver bullet", [product name-indiumease]! i was wondering if anyone has tryed it, or even heard about it!!
i took my first dose, as suggested. early this morning on an empty stomach!! 3 hours later feel very much awake and energetic, [placebo?] but i think fron what i have read on-line it is promising!!! just wanted to share...john
btw, 26 dollars for 90 day supply at my local health food store!!!!
Posted by nolvas on November 13, 2005, at 7:53:42
In reply to indium-micro-nutrient!!, posted by john berk on November 12, 2005, at 7:48:10
It's obviously based on this chemical element >
http://periodic.lanl.gov/elements/49.html
What studies have you found about indiumease? Sounds interesting.
Posted by john berk on November 13, 2005, at 10:45:56
In reply to Re: indium-micro-nutrient!!, posted by nolvas on November 13, 2005, at 7:53:42
http://www.indiumease.net/
Hi, i found alot of good information here!!
i'm on day 2, i will keep you posted...john
Posted by Larry Hoover on November 14, 2005, at 14:11:42
In reply to Re: indium-micro-nutrient!! » nolvas, posted by john berk on November 13, 2005, at 10:45:56
> http://www.indiumease.net/
> Hi, i found alot of good information here!!
> i'm on day 2, i will keep you posted...johnI don't know what to make of quotations such as these, from the indiumease website:
"The Indium molecule is 2-3 Angstroms wide comprised of 49 Protons, surrounded by five Orbits of 66 Electrons."
Somebody has looked at a periodic table, and has tried to interpret the data there. An indium *atom* is 1.51 angstroms wide (relevance ?), but the indium (III) ion in indium sulphate (what is supplied in this product, in solution) is 0.81 angstroms wide. The nucleus does contain 49 protons, but it does not have 66 electrons. The atomic weight of indium averages 114.8 amu, so that means there is an average of (114.8 minus 49 equals) 66 neutrons in the nucleus. The indium (III) ion supplied in this product has 46 electrons, but so what? Indium has electrons in the 5th shell (5s2, 5p1), but only in the metallic state. The salt does not have those electrons. It does have 23 orbitals for its 46 electrons, but again, so what?
"Lasering or altering the fundamental Indium molecule gives an unknown, unnatural, unpredictable, possibly hazardous, fractured molecule that may have detrimental effects or cause free radical damage."
First off, indium is an element. It comes in atoms, not molecules. Lasering has no effect, and it cannot be altered or fractured unless it is involved in nuclear reactions (i.e. it would have to be radioactive). I don't know how indium could be unnatural or unknown, but it certainly could become involved in free radical damage. It's a carcinogen.
Here's one simple opinion:
http://physicalsciences.ucsd.edu/news_events/QA/qa_072804.htmI'm sorry, but I can't find any evidence for using this stuff.
Lar
Posted by john berk on November 14, 2005, at 14:20:44
In reply to Re: indium-micro-nutrient!! » john berk, posted by Larry Hoover on November 14, 2005, at 14:11:42
Hi Larry, thank you for providing that link, i was a bit skeptical, i was hoping you would post!!i have taken it 3 days, and already, [maybe my inmagination] but i fell slightly out of whack, then i read somewhere that it can mess with the functioning of your meds!! i am now going to make a deposit to my nearest trash bin, i knew those claims were too good to be true!!!
thank you so much, i appreciate your time...john
Posted by tealady on November 15, 2005, at 0:05:00
In reply to Re: indium-micro-nutrient!! » john berk, posted by Larry Hoover on November 14, 2005, at 14:11:42
>. Lasering has no effect, and it cannot be altered or fractured unless it is involved in nuclear reactions (i.e. it would have to be radioactive). I don't know how indium could be unnatural or unknown, but it certainly could become involved in free radical damage. It's a carcinogen.
Here's one simple opinion:
http://physicalsciences.ucsd.edu/news_events/QA/qa_072804.htmI'm sorry, but I can't find any evidence for using this stuff.
Hi Lar,
Oh dear, and 'ere I was thinking taking some radioactive stuff just might burn off some body fat;)
I do like the blurb though..http://www.indiumease.net/benefits.htm
"Better distinguishing of sexual gender dominance . . . over the long term.
The divorce rate from gender-incompatibility lowered.
The incidence of driving under the influence of alcohol will drop off, from reduced effects and incresased
costs.Overweight people will trim up.
Elderly bound to wheelchairs, homes, hospitals, and institutionalizations will drop off." ..
NB. I'm joking folks!
Wonder if there would be trace amounts of this stuff (hopefully not hit by lasers etc.) in sea salt? .. not that sea salt is much good with all the pollution in the ocean these days
Jan (who uses sea salt anyway at times)
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Alternative | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.