![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 1 of 1. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Phil on October 9, 2003, at 10:05:57
'Whizzinator' Gets Texas Men in Trouble
By BETSY BLANEY
Associated Press WriterOctober 9, 2003, 9:44 AM EDT
LUBBOCK, Texas -- Some West Texas men on probation are in trouble again,
this time for using the Whizzinator to help them pass court-ordered
urinalysis tests.In the past six months, five men on probation were caught using a
realistic-looking prosthetic that dispenses synthetic, drug-free urine,
Lubbock County sheriff's officials said. One was caught by an alert officer
who heard something unusual in the restroom."A body part when it's up against a plastic cup isn't going to go 'clink,'"
said Tom Madigan, interim assistant director of the Lubbock County adult
probation office.The device, reusable and available in five flesh colors, is sold by
California-based Puck Technology for $150. A prosthetic penis is attached
to an undergarment resembling a jock strap and connects to a pouch
containing dehydrated urine. Water is added to the pouch and a heat pack
can be attached to keep the urine close to body temperature.Company owner Dennis Catalano has sold the device and one designed for
women for about four years, mainly through an Internet site. He said what
he does is legal."How people choose to use it is beyond our control," he said. "But we
manufacture this and sell it for people who believe we still have a
semblance of privacy in this country."The five Lubbock men caught using the device will probably get their
probation revoked and return to jail, said Dan Rowan, a probation office
supervisor.They also could face additional charges. Under Texas law, using a substance
or device to try to falsify drug test results is a Class B misdemeanor,
which carries a maximum penalty of 180 days in jail and a $2,000 fine.Catalano isn't safe, either. Selling or making a device or substance
intended to falsify urine test results is a Class A misdemeanor, with a
maximum one-year jail term and $4,000 fine. Authorities haven't decided
whether they will seek charges against the manufacturer.In 2001, two San Antonio probationers caught using the Whizzinator were
prosecuted and sentenced to 180 days in jail and fined $2,000, said Susan
Reed, the Bexar County district attorney.Reed considered pursuing charges against the company, but said she would
have had difficulty showing that it sold the device in her jurisdiction.What doesn't make sense, Rowan said, is that offenders sometime spend more
on devices to beat the test than they spend on drugs."It seems they will stop at nothing," said Rowan, noting that sometimes
offenders use their children's urine to try and pass tests. "They won't
continue with their sobriety, and they'll exhaust any method possible to
continue with their drug usage."
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Substance Use | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.