Posted by Dr. Bob on March 29, 2003, at 1:49:37
In reply to Re: Picamilon -- legality? » Dr. Bob, posted by Viridis on March 29, 2003, at 0:23:50
> > > I don't understand all the secrecy about sources ... if you type "picamilon xxx" into Google, the main source that pops up is based in San Diego. So, it doesn't look like it's controlled in the U.S.
> >
> > I may be wrong, but picamilon seems to be considered a dietary supplement, at least for now [so it's OK to post sources]. The issue with sources is that they sometimes sell, or link to sources that sell, prescription drugs without a prescription or drugs that haven't been approved by the FDA [so those it's not OK to post].
>
> I'm not trying to be difficult, but I am a little confused. If a U.S. supplier offers a "dietary supplement", shipped from within the country, doesn't that make it OK unless it's clearly a controlled substance?Yes. Sorry about not being clearer before. See the additions above. Is that better?
Bob
poster:Dr. Bob
thread:211714
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20030325/msgs/213981.html