Re: Provigil Q. Dark Lord Mitch et al » Geezer

Posted by Ritch on June 14, 2003, at 15:17:53

In reply to Re: Provigil Q. Dark Lord Mitch et al » Ritch, posted by Geezer on June 14, 2003, at 13:45:19

> Thanks Mitch,
>
> First, hope you were not offended by the "Dark Lord" tag awarded by Colin ( he is such a rip...much better than CBT ). Thank you for the explanation, I do understand things much better now. Your "pre-clinical" - "clinical" comment did not go unnoticed. Since there is no "empirical science" involved at all in psychiatry (even double blind testing is measured with psychological tests = anecdotal, subjective result). Thank you for helping me understand.
>
> Geezer
OH no I wasn't offended at all, I thought it was pretty funny actually. I had read those statements from the prescribing info for Provigil before and hadn't really thought about it until I read your post. What utility does that statement about the "pre-clinical model" really have for a prescribing physician other than a marketing technique ??

Thread

Provigil Q. Dark Lord Mitch et al Geezer 6/13/03
Re: Provigil Q. Dark Lord Mitch et al avid abulia 6/13/03
Re: Provigil Q. Dark Lord Mitch et al » Geezer Ritch 6/13/03
my personal experience avid abulia 6/14/03
Re: Provigil Q. Dark Lord Mitch et al » Ritch Geezer 6/14/03
Re: Provigil Q. Dark Lord Mitch et al » Geezer Ritch 6/14/03
Re: Provigil Q. Dark Lord Mitch et al Caleb462 6/14/03
Re: Provigil Q. Dark Lord Mitch et al » Geezer colin wallace 6/14/03
Re: Provigil Q. Dark Lord Mitch et al » colin wallace Geezer 6/14/03

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Ritch thread:233841
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20030614/msgs/233982.html