Posted by chemist on August 29, 2004, at 20:07:25
In reply to Re: Ecstasy safely converted and prescribed?, posted by verne on August 29, 2004, at 19:50:19
hello there, chemist here....thank you for sharing your opinions. mine are delineated by asterisks, below. all the best, chemist
> There's nothing "safe", "useful", or "positive" about ecstasy as the chemist suggests.
*** is this your opinion, or is this a factual statement? further, you refer to ecstacy, and hence by using the ``street'' name, i conclude you are referring to the illicitly and often contaminated substance sold as pure 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine: am i correct? ***
>
> I don't know the chemistry but ecstasy uses up something in the brain having to do with the capacity to feel pleasure.*** the above statement does not lend credence to your opening salvo: you deny knowledge of the chemistry involved and implicate depletion of a substance you are unable to name. ***
"Holes" in the brain are readily visible in those who've taken even a few doses.
*** are you sure? please do point me in the direction of the source(s) of this claim. thanks in advance. ***
>
> And as pointed out already in this thread, untreatable depression is the result.*** again, please provide some references. i am obviously very interested in this topic - as are you - and i look forward to adding your supporting materials to my files. ***
poster:chemist
thread:383476
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20040825/msgs/383840.html