Posted by paulbwell on March 31, 2005, at 21:03:36
In reply to Re: frustrated! » paulbwell, posted by CareBear04 on March 31, 2005, at 20:40:31
> good point, paul! i was first in line for others like lexapro, abilify, and xanax xr, and i don't have anything good to say about any of them. i guess i've bought into the lunesta hype. lexapro was the first psych drug i ever tried, and i heard and read so much about how great and new it is that it made me even more depressed when the trial failed miserably. i should have learned by now that newer doesn't always mean better.
> i was reading through old journals today, and i see that when restoril worked, it really worked. ambien has been good to me for two years, but it's not working well anymore. maybe i'll try going back to restoril.
> thanks again for the advice.Thanks
latest doesn't mean better--you got it gal!!!
Often older is better, don't be fooled by dope-pushing pharm giants -They dont give a sh*t about people only money!!, and dont buy into their nazi-like propaganda-its al about MONEY- not health, caring about people or public welfare, only and always 1 thing unfortunatly
MONEY
I took Celexa when it came out, and i became a depressed vegetable--I will never again believe a dope company or a Doc i don't trust.
I take 1 54yo med-Ritalin
1 take 1 42yo med-Valiumand they work better than the 6 so-called 'anti depressants' or other rubbish in shiny pretty boxes, I have stupidly put in my mouth.
Lunestras makers dnt care about you or anyone else! they care about as many people as possible taking as many of their pills as possible.
MONEY
MONEY
MONEY sorry, way it is
aaaaaaa rant over now,Cheers Care
poster:paulbwell
thread:475913
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20050330/msgs/478350.html