Posted by tecknohed on November 1, 2005, at 21:08:52
In reply to The other Nardil, posted by willyee on November 1, 2005, at 18:29:13
Hi
I get confused about this issue myself. It does seem that its the people switching from old to new that experience the problems. One thing thats mentioned is the coating being different. Apparently the new one 'melts in the mouth'. I'm in the UK and my Nardil works fine and has always had that 'melt in the mouth' quality. I'm unaware of the UK Nardil having ever been changed.
If people are that convinced, then I would suggest try using Nardil as a suppository - no kidding! (oops! have I just gained some new enemies?). Wouldn't that avoid any problems caused by its breakdown/absorbtion in the gastrointestinal system? ;-) Some Extacy (MDMA) pill users swear by this 'method'!
Another thing. I have witnessed a person convince themself into a relapse because thier Pharmacy started stocking a generic fluoxetine instead of the usual Prozac this person was used to. He didn't understand the concept of generics so convinced himself it wasn't working and played around with the dose etc. I've also seen many people come into a pharmacy complaining that thier meds aren't working as well, because it's a different looking med/brand/packing/generic - "its not working! Its different from the last one". I wonder if its kind of the same thing with the new/old Nardil?
When you're convinced of something, it becomes fact.teck
poster:tecknohed
thread:574256
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20051031/msgs/574327.html