Posted by Davex on December 30, 2005, at 19:09:26
In reply to Re: LIQUID V/s SOLID form, WHY different efficacy? » Davex, posted by Larry Hoover on December 30, 2005, at 13:09:53
Hi Lar,
Thanks for your helpfull support!
Sincerely i have not thought about that possibility. I've only supposed that there was something in the different adjunctive compounds present in the drug. But we know that they should be inactive at all.
I'm completely in accordance with you and think you're right, but let me say that (and is only an inpression) even if you let dissolve the pill in the mounth, there is not the same of haveing it in the liquid form.....i think there is, however, something different as if liquid were metabolized in a different way or bind neurotrasmitters differently.
Thanks you again, i will let you know how it goes on!Hi Ed!
Yes, I am on L-sulpiride (levosulpiride, brand name Levopraid). It is a purified fraction of sulpiride. Sulpiride is composed by two stereo-isomers (l- and r- sulpiride). The first is the only active, r- is supposed to be inactive and that produce any side-effects.
So you can say that l-supiride is twice as potent as sulpiride with supposed less side effects.
I'm currently on 75 mg/d (three times a day 25). A greater quantity seems to produce to me more somnolence.
I tryed Amisulpride. The first 2 days it was great! I could say it produced a cocaine-like effect. But in the following days it faded and somnolence and anxiety came over caused probably by the Tolerance.
Never found out a schedule to make Amisulpride work continuosly.
Bye
Mike
poster:Davex
thread:593444
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20051221/msgs/593546.html