Posted by forgetful mary on March 13, 2006, at 19:02:25
In reply to Re: Adjusting the dose, posted by notfred on March 12, 2006, at 23:47:59
It is not that easy....increasing the dose does not work for everyone, and still is inefficient. Or should I say "allegedly" inefficient. I for one am not saying the new nardil is useless. I have said it is better than SSRI's and better than nothing, but still not as good as it was. What "agenda" are you referring to ??
Gimme my old Nardil and I needn't even post on this board. Your assumption is wrong and insulting. Only those who tried the old Nardil know what I am talking about and are able to comment on the difference. Any other opinions are merely suppositions and should be treated as such....> "Some of the symptoms people have reported when transitioning from the 'old' Nardil to the 'new' Nardil resemble withdrawal symptoms. It is possible that the new formulation may have resulted in slightly lower bioavailability. If this is true, increasing the dose or frequency of administration should help. Why is no one discussing this? The 'new' Nardil is all we have. We must learn to optimise its efficacy and usefulness, rather than dismissing it as useless."
>
>
> Given how simple it is to counter the alleged difference between the old and new Nardil, namely taking a bit more Nardil, I do not think all this is really about the new Nardil. There is a different agenda here.
poster:forgetful mary
thread:617166
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060310/msgs/619904.html