Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Is Valium more potent than Xanax? » ed_uk

Posted by zeugma on April 2, 2006, at 12:28:54

In reply to Re: Is Valium more potent than Xanax? » SLS, posted by ed_uk on March 31, 2006, at 16:46:24

It's often noted than the benzodiazepines differ more in their pharmacokinetics than in their pharmacodynamics.>>

Hi Ed.

The often-noted greater prevalence of depression as a result of clonazepam relative to other benzos, would appear to disprove this.

BTW I have not experienced depressive symtoms from clonazepam, and the problems I have had with sleep architecture disruption would be common to all benzodiazepines (as far as I know). Benzos suppress NREM stages 3-4 preferentially, presumably as part of their mechanism of anticonvulsant action, and they incidentally reduce REM because one normally enters REM after cycling through NREM stages 1-4. Blockade of NREM 3-4 in someone who does not exhibit this pattern, however, will experience increased REM by means of a process analogous to displacement in physics (if you put a bar of soap in a tub full of water, the tub will overspill, even though no water has been added).

It is a common misconception that benzos block REM, as an intrinsic property of theirs, as evidenced by an authoritative survey I have in my file, which contains many other inaccuracies, but which I will linger on now.

-z

Ed


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:zeugma thread:627071
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060329/msgs/627822.html