Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Inhibitor vs Antagonist - definition? » ricker

Posted by Larry Hoover on September 3, 2008, at 8:28:05

In reply to Inhibitor vs Antagonist - definition?, posted by ricker on September 2, 2008, at 12:48:00

> Inhibitor - prevents the cell from releasing chemical, therefore there is an increase in volume/production.

In the context of reuptake, an inhibitor of a neurotransmitter pump increases the exposure time of receptors in a synapse (the gap between neurons where receptors are most abundant). That can increase the magnitude of the effect of the neurotransmitter (amplifying it). That can have two consequences: a) enhanced immediate response; b) reduced long-term response. The latter can occur because of two mechanisms: a) down-regulation of downstream receptors because the signal was greater than the pre-existing average signal; b) down-regulation of neurotransmitter production via pre-synaptic receptor response.

The bottom line is things are very complicated, with all sorts of feed-back regulation. What effect will dominate, i.e. what we'll actually see happen, can differ substantially from what we hope to have happen.

Lar

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:Larry Hoover thread:849895
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20080903/msgs/850045.html