Posted by bleauberry on September 9, 2009, at 21:28:39
In reply to Lou's request -vudupsi, posted by Lou Pilder on September 9, 2009, at 19:50:01
>
> bb,
> You wrote,[...certain meds..work on certain symptoms, the opposite is true...certain meds which.. will not work...>will< work on you..].Interesting editing of my words. It kind of twists what I actually said.
> I am interested in any authority that you may have to substantiate such.
I am an authority on nothing except playing outrageous guitar. That, my friend, I am an authority on.
(A), If you could post here a link to an article that shows such, then I could have a better understanding of this and respond accordingly.
www.pubmed.com Roam at will.
(B), In,[...will work on... you...], (redacted by respondent)
> LouHi Lou,
I am not an authority on anything except live guitar performance.
I thought I gave some good examples already.
Ritalin can make kids calm. What, a stimulant will calm someone down? Are you kidding? You don't need any clinical studies for that. Just visit some classrooms. Someone could actually feel tired or sleepy on an amphetamine? Are you kidding? Well, the archives here have enough examples of that to show it happens. Actually, right on this very page right now.
Me and Milnacipran. Now that made no sense at all. That drug should have wired me out. To calm me down the way it did was weird. And sleep, gosh, awesome sleep. How the heck do you increase norepinephrine and sleep good? That makes no sense to me. Milnacipran is not prescribed for anxiety, plain and simple. So why is it that it worked so well when all the obvious contenders didn't?
Go to pubmed and do some searching on your questions about studies showing how things have paradoxical effects. There is a lot there. I'm sorry, I don't bookmark every one of them, though I have read thousands of them.
poster:bleauberry
thread:916101
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20090902/msgs/916279.html