Posted by psych chat on September 14, 2009, at 23:03:56
In reply to Levamisole, posted by AMD on September 8, 2009, at 15:05:31
Before the group think begins, why would cocaine be cut with a pharmacological agent when baking soda and other similar substances are easier to obtain and cost much less?
Where is the incentive to replace pure cocaine with a "hard-core chemotherapy drug" or deworming medication? I suppose your findings could be realistic if deworming and anti-cancer drugs lead to some sort of cocaine-like pseudo high; however, if that is the case, in the absence of incentives to use Borax or baking soda, would it not still be cheaper and more practical or more cost-effective to use 'real' cocaine as opposed to the utilization of FDA-regulated drugs for fillers?
In seems, in most cases, the implementation of capitalism gravitates more towards logic than it does in regard to 'other' forces.
But yeah, no matter how you look at at, cocaine is bad news.
poster:psych chat
thread:916107
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20090912/msgs/917134.html