Posted by Phillipa on December 31, 2009, at 21:52:41
In reply to Re: What Would you do if doc refuses to treat no Recla, posted by mtdewcmu on December 31, 2009, at 19:12:39
Read the full 10 pages and so did my husband. We agree that for those that have side effects their lives change forever for the worst. Sounds effective for some but not all. I've had no fractures, and I still feel especially since no prior dosing with D was recommended by the doc something is wrong. User reviews aren't that great. And most of the improvements were after three years of treatment. So if you fall into the patients that say they will never take it again you get only positive responders in next two groups and since approval was in 2007 has anyone actually benefited? It's too soon to tell to me. Please argue and point out what I have read wrong. I'd appreciate that. Definitely no adverse consequences from calling me an idiot or whatever I will make sure of that from posting it now. Thanks Phillipa
poster:Phillipa
thread:931812
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20091227/msgs/931919.html