Re: Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up? Evidence?

Posted by gilmourr on October 17, 2012, at 10:29:28

In reply to Re: Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up? Evidence?, posted by jono_in_adelaide on October 16, 2012, at 22:59:38

Yeah, going to ween off.
I'm thinking 15 mg every 4 days. Off completely by Day 9, then go as many days as I possibly can without it.
It's going to be awful since last time my eyes were bloodshot, depression came back very hard and I had night terrors/nightmares

Thread

Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up? Evidence? gilmourr 10/16/12
Re: Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up? Evidence? » gilmourr phillipa 10/16/12
Re: Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up? Evidence? gilmourr 10/16/12
Re: Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up? Evidence? jono_in_adelaide 10/16/12
Re: Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up? Evidence? gilmourr 10/16/12
Re: Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up? Evidence? gilmourr 10/16/12
Re: Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up? Evidence? jono_in_adelaide 10/16/12
Re: Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up? Evidence? gilmourr 10/17/12
Re: Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up? Evidence? » gilmourr phidippus 10/20/12
Re: Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up?Gillmore jono_in_adelaide 10/22/12
Re: Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up? Evidence? gilmourr 10/22/12
Re: Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up?Gillmore gilmourr 10/22/12
Re: Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up?Gillmore » gilmourr phidippus 10/22/12
Re: Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up? Evidence? » gilmourr phidippus 10/22/12
Re: Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up? Evidence? gilmourr 10/24/12
Re: Reduce Nardil to 30 then back up? Evidence? » gilmourr phidippus 10/25/12

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:gilmourr thread:1028844
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20121009/msgs/1028942.html

	for
in