Posted by Larry Hoover on February 14, 2005, at 11:25:24
In reply to Re: Is NADH available in Canada ?? » Larry Hoover, posted by jasmineneroli on February 8, 2005, at 0:41:14
> Hi Lar: I believe it was enteric coated, but I actually gave them to my daughter, so I can't check for myself.
> I did a search to see if Swiss Herbal mentions that, but only found the following. Since it refers to a change to NAD rather than NADH, I thought you might be interested:
>
> "Ingredients: NAD (Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide) 2.5mgI think Swiss got caught poaching on another company's patented territory, that's what I think.
> A clinical study presented by Forsyth et al, at the 1998 meeting of the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology reported the results of NAD tested in a double-blind, placebo controlled study of patients with CFS.The clinical study being referenced involved Enada-brand NADH. Interesting that Swiss twisted this around to support their own product (which I believe may be inferior, and which certainly *is* inferior if it is not enteric-coated).
> The bottle I bought definitely had NADH on it. Not NAD. Would NAD be inferior, or different in it's actions, since it's been oxidized, coenzyme form?.Sometimes, it is better to go with the more expensive, patented product. It is my opinion this is one such case.
> I had actually used Enada brand ordered online, before I found the Swiss Herbal version, locally (as NADH) in a healthfood store and purchased it for my daughter (last year).
What was your daughter's response?
> I've emailed the company for more info.
> Regards, JasDon't be too surprised if you get more "press release" type information.
Lar
poster:Larry Hoover
thread:454017
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/alter/20050131/msgs/457593.html