Posted by gardenergirl on March 7, 2004, at 0:11:57
In reply to Re: Projective tests ... are they worth it? » gardenergirl, posted by Apperceptor on March 6, 2004, at 23:48:38
>
> We did the semester of Exner too....by the end, I found myself thinking "FABCOM" while talking to people. :-)ROFL!!!
>About gero, you make some good suggestions. The only opportunity I had to do a Rorschach with one of my older clients was not good. She was so guarded she obviously was censoring, as much came out in the inquiry that I'm sure she censored in the beginning. Also, she really didn't understand the inquiry phase. Only marginally valid. And this was my CCE case. Oh well. I had lots more to go on.
There is a Senior Apperception Test (just remembered it from Gero Assessment.) It seems to be much less ambiguous than the TAT, though. Quite obvious what it is pulling for. I think I would be more inclined to stick with the TAT.
Thanks!
gg
poster:gardenergirl
thread:320878
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20040303/msgs/321465.html