Re: Serzone side effects - just temporary?James

Posted by stjames on December 5, 2000, at 15:10:24

In reply to Re: Serzone side effects - just temporary?James, posted by R.Anne on December 5, 2000, at 14:57:50

> From where I was standing, you never said you were clearly wrong.
James here....
Then what does this mean ?
"It is clearly not true nor was it my
intent. I'm sorry, CatSparkle."
I even used the word clearly !
james

Thread

Serzone side effects - just temporary? CatSparkle 11/24/00
...
Re: clarification (oops - also posted below) Crystal 11/28/00
Re: Serzone side effects - just temporary? » shellie SLS 11/28/00
Re: clarification (oops - also posted below) » Crystal catsparkle 11/28/00
Re: Serzone side effects - just temporary? dove 11/29/00
Re: long-term ad ineffectiveness: scott and dove shellie 11/29/00
Re: long-term ad ineffectiveness: scott and dove » shellie SLS 11/29/00
Re: poop out stjames 11/30/00
Re: Strong Reaction R.Anne 12/1/00
Re: Serzone side effects - just temporary?James R.Anne 12/1/00
Re: Serzone side effects - just temporary?James stjames 12/1/00
Depression-Risk of Recurrence JohnB 12/2/00
Re: Serzone side effects - just temporary?James R.Anne 12/5/00
Re: Serzone side effects - just temporary?James stjames 12/5/00
Serzone is the bomb! tricksaturnsc2 3/6/03
Re: Serzone is the bomb! noa 3/6/03
ditto everything you said. » noa beardedlady 3/7/03
Re: serzone noa 3/7/03
Re: serzone » noa beardedlady 3/8/03

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:stjames thread:49361
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20001130/msgs/49979.html

	for
in