Posted by JackD on January 12, 2005, at 11:32:54
In reply to Re: diminishing tolerence to opiates » lew, posted by jerrympls on January 11, 2005, at 20:21:10
Sigh... I seriously feel like some people on this board are incompetent or maybe just lazy or possibly just not computer savvy... I've posted numerous posts on this subject in hopes of helping SOMEONE, and they've all gone pretty much ignored (except by marketing reps). Anyway, here's some helpful stuff (in short, MEMANTINE, AKA Namenda, prevents and reverses tolerance safely, I can attest to it from personal experience, I won't even go into the dangers and messiness of DXM. Besides, what are you going to do, an acid-base extraction of cough syrup? Or just drink a few bottles, which you'd have to to get even close to enough DXM to work, with your meds). Also, I recommended against the use of a DIRECT opiate agonist for depression for what I thought were obvious reason, but anyway there's some abstracts I included here showing that antidepressants, some more than others, ultimately have significant impact on the opiate system and should be used instead of actual opiates. There's other useful info about the similarites of Tramadol and Effexor, and some other stuff that anyone with a decent understanding of pharmacology might hopefully find extremely useful. Gulp.. here goes:
------------"Pharmacological treatment of neuralgic and neuropathic pain."
McQuay HJ.
Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University, Abingdon.
The current pharmacological management of neuropathic pain with antidepressants, anticonvulsants, drugs with action on the autonomic nervous system, steroids, baclofen and naloxone is reviewed. The underlying clinical theme of relative opioid insensitivity of neuropathic pain is emphasized. Future pharmacological approaches in neuropathic pain are suggested on the basis of the mechanism of action of the current remedies. The problems of clinical trials in this area are discussed.
--------"Opioid receptors and neuropeptides in the CNS in rats treated chronically with amoxapine or amitriptyline."
Hamon M, Gozlan H, Bourgoin S, Benoliel JJ, Mauborgne A, Taquet H, Cesselin F, Mico JA.
The central mechanism responsible for the potentiation by antidepressant drugs of analgesia induced by morphine, was explored by measuring the levels of various neuropeptides (met-enkephalin, leu-enkephalin, dynorphin, substance P and cholecystokinin-like materials) and the density of delta and mu opioid binding sites in the spinal cord of rats treated for 14 days with amoxapine (10 mg/kg i.p., daily) or amitriptyline (10 mg/kg i.p., daily). Similar measurements were made in the hypothalamus and cerebral cortex for comparison. Chronic treatment with amoxapine or amitriptyline did not affect the levels of dynorphin, substance P and cholecystokinin, but markedly enhanced the levels of leu-enkephalin in the three structures examined. The levels of met-enkephalin were also increased after treatment with amitriptyline but only in the spinal cord and hypothalamus. No changes in opioid receptors were found in the cerebral cortex, but the densities of delta and mu opioid binding sites were increased in the spinal cord, and decreased in the hypothalamus of rats treated with amoxapine or amitriptyline. These changes induced by antidepressants in opioidergic markers at the spinal level might account for the potentiation of the action of morphine in amoxapine- or amitriptyline-treated rats. In addition, the observed alterations in the same markers in the hypothalamus could be associated with changes induced by antidepressants in neuroendocrine regulation.
------------
"Amitriptyline potentiates morphine analgesia by a direct action on the central nervous system."
Botney M, Fields HL.
Trycyclic antidepressants are often effective in the management of neuropathic pains. To elucidate the mechanism of tricyclic-induced analgesia, amitriptyline and other drugs were injected into lightly anesthetized rats either systemically or via lumbar intrathecal cannulas. Analgesia was assessed by measuring the latency of the tail flick reflex. Using this model, intrathecal amitriptyline (30 micrograms) significantly enhanced the analgesic effect of an intraperitoneal dose of morphine (0.5 mg/kg) that by itself produced no measurable effect. Given systemically, amitriptyline (30 or 100 micrograms intraperitoneally) was ineffective. Cocaine (30 micrograms) also potentiated morphine analgesia, but iprindole, a tricyclic antidepressant with a very weak inhibitory effect on monoamine uptake, was ineffective. This enhancement of analgesia by intrathecal amitriptyline was prevented by pretreating the rats with p-chlorophenylalanine (300 mg/kg). These results are consistent with the hypothesis that amitriptyline produces analgesia by blocking serotonin uptake and therefore enhancing the action of serotonin at the spinal terminals of an opioid-mediated intrinsic analgesia system.
------------------
"Antinociceptive activity of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist N-(2-Indanyl)-glycinamide hydrochloride (CHF3381) in experimental models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain."
Villetti G, Bergamaschi M, Bassani F, Bolzoni PT, Maiorino M, Pietra C, Rondelli I, Chamiot-Clerc P, Simonato M, Barbieri M.
Research and Development Department, Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA, Parma, Italy. g.villetti@chiesigroup.com
N-(2-Indanyl)-glycinamide hydrochloride (CHF3381) is a novel low-affinity, noncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist. The current study compared the antinociceptive effects of CHF3381 with those of gabapentin and memantine in in vitro and in vivo models of pain. In isolated rat spinal cord, CHF3381 and memantine, but not gabapentin, produced similar inhibition of the wind-up phenomenon. CHF3381 suppressed the maintenance of carrageenan-induced thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia in the rat with a minimum significantly effective dose (MED) of 30 mg/kg p.o. Memantine produced a partial reversal of both thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia (MED = 10 and 15 mg/kg i.p., respectively). Gabapentin reversed mechanical hyperalgesia (MED = 10 mg/kg s.c.), but did not affect thermal hyperalgesia. In the mouse formalin test, CHF3381 and memantine preferentially inhibited the late phase (MED = 30 and 20 mg/kg i.p., respectively); gabapentin inhibited only the late phase (MED = 30 mg/kg s.c.). Unlike morphine, CHF3381 chronic administration was not accompanied by the development of tolerance in the formalin test. Furthermore, morphine tolerance did not cross-generalize to CHF3381. In rats with a sciatic nerve injury, CHF3381 relieved both cold and mechanical allodynia (MED = 100 mg/kg p.o.). In contrast, memantine was inactive. Gabapentin blocked cold allodynia (MED = 30 mg/kg s.c.), but had marginal effects on mechanical allodynia. In diabetic neuropathy, CHF3381 reversed mechanical hyperalgesia (MED = 50 mg/kg p.o.). Memantine (15 mg/kg i.p.) produced an antinociceptive effect, whereas gabapentin (100 mg/kg p.o.) had no significant effect. Thus, CHF3381 may be useful for the therapy of peripheral painful neuropathies.
------------
"Memantine presents different effects from MK-801 in motivational and physical signs of morphine withdrawal."
Maldonado C, Cauli O, Rodriguez-Arias M, Aguilar MA, Minarro J.
Area de Psicobiologia, Facultad de Psicologia, Universitat de Valencia, Aptdo. 22109, 46071 Valencia, Spain.
"Adaptive changes in neural systems due to chronic opiate exposure are related to the neural plasticity phenomenon, NMDA receptors being implicated in these processes, e.g. tolerance, dependence or withdrawal. In this work, we investigated the effect of two non-competitive NMDA antagonists, memantine and MK-801, in motivational (Conditioned Place Aversion paradigm, CPA) and physical aspects of morphine withdrawal. After the induction of morphine dependence, animals in which the CPA was studied, received memantine (5 and 10 mg/kg) or MK-801 (0.3-0.006 mg/kg) either during the acquisition (conditioning) or expression (test) phase of this procedure. Both drugs were capable of inhibiting conditioned aversion when administered in any phase. In a second experiment, the effects of these drugs were evaluated in the intensity of the physical signs of withdrawal, only memantine administration being efficient. In addition to these studies, the intensity of morphine dependence was investigated under the blockade of NMDA receptors, i.e. morphine was co-administered with memantine or MK-801. These animals did not develop CPA and present less intensity in the physical signs of morphine withdrawal. Our results support the idea that NMDA receptors are involved in the behavioural changes and therefore in the neural adaptations produced by repeated morphine administration.
------------
"Antinociceptive activity of combination of morphine and NMDA receptor antagonists depends on the inter-injection interval."
Belozertseva IV, Dravolina OA, Neznanova ON, Danysz W, Bespalov AY.
Laboratory of Behavioural Pharmacology, Department of Psychopharmacology, Institute of Pharmacology, Pavlov Medical University, 6/8 Leo Tolstoy St., 197089, St. Petersburg, Russia.
The actual time-course of morphine antinociception is shorter than what would be predicted from its elimination kinetics, suggesting the presence of an acute tolerance phenomenon. Since antagonists acting at NMDA subtype of glutamate receptors were repeatedly shown to prolong acute morphine antinociception, acute tolerance may be attributed to hyperactivity of NMDA receptors. The ability of various site-selective NMDA receptor antagonists to affect morphine antinociception (tail-flick test) was assessed in mice 30 and 120 min after acute morphine challenge. Competitive NMDA receptor antagonist 3-(2-carboxypiperazin-4-yl)-1-propenyl-1-phosphonic acid (D-CPPene) (SDZ EAA 494; 0.1-1 mg/kg), low-affinity channel blockers 1-amino-3,5-dimethyl adamantane (memantine) (1-10 mg/kg) and 1-amino-1,3,3,5,5-pentamethyl-cyclohexan hydrochloride (MRZ 2/579) (1-10 mg/kg), glycine site antagonists 5-nitro-6,7-dichloro-1, 4-dihydro-2,3-quinoxalinedione (ACEA-1021) (5 or 10 mg/kg) and 8-chloro-4-hydroxy-1-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridaliono(4, 5-b)quinoline-5-oxide choline salt (MRZ 2/576) (1-10 mg/kg) were administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) 15 or 30 min prior to the tail-flick test (i.e., interval between injections of morphine and NMDA receptor antagonist was either 0-15 or 90-105 min). ACEA-1021, MRZ 2/576 and to the lesser extent, memantine and MRZ 2/579 enhanced morphine antinociception when tests were conducted 120 but not 30 min post-morphine. D-CPPene potentiated morphine antinociception irrespective of the interval between morphine administration and the tail-flick test. The results suggest that NMDA receptor antagonists may restore analgesic activity of morphine in acutely tolerant mice.
------------"Non-selective opioid receptor antagonism of the antidepressant-like effect of venlafaxine in the forced swimming test in mice."
Berrocoso E, Rojas-Corrales MO, Mico JA.
Pharmacology and Neuroscience Research Group (PAI-510), Department of Neuroscience (Pharmacology and Psychiatry), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cadiz, Plaza Falla, 9, 11003 Cadiz, Spain.
The opioid system has been implicated in mood disorders as well as in the mechanism of action of antidepressants. Since the opioid component in venlafaxine (VLX) is still a matter of discussion, we investigated the role of opioid receptors in the antidepressant-like effect of VLX in the forced swimming test in mice. The non-selective opiate antagonist naloxone at high dose (2 mg/kg, s.c.) antagonized the effect of VLX. In contrast, beta-funaltrexamine (40 mg/kg, s.c.), which preferentially blocks mu(1)/mu(2) opioid receptors, naloxonazine (35 mg/kg, s.c.), a selective mu(1) opioid antagonist, naltrindole (10 mg/kg, s.c.), a selective delta opioid antagonist, and Nor-binaltorphimine (10 mg/kg, s.c.), which selectively blocks kappa-opioid receptors, were all ineffective. Thus, although apparently mediated by the opioid system, the behavioural effect of VLX does not involve specific opioid receptors.
---------
"Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain caused by injury to the afferent nerve fibers"
[Article in Dutch]
Weber WE.
Academisch Ziekenhuis, afd. Neurologie, Postbus 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht.
Phantom pain, a form of neuropathic pain, is caused by damage to somatosensible afferent nerve fibres in the peripheral or central nervous system. Often, the pain cannot be satisfactorily treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Dependent on the underlying mechanism the pain is treated with either antidepressants (for more or less continuous pain) or anti-epileptics (for paroxysmal pain). Of the antidepressants, the tricyclic antidepressants are the best studied and most prescribed. The activity of new drugs, such as the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine as well as venlafaxine, has yet to be clearly shown. Of the anti-epileptics, carbamazepine and phenytoin are the most prescribed. New drugs which provide greater pain relief than the placebo are oxcarbazepine, gabapentine and lamotrigine. Other effective drugs for phantom pain are: gamma-butyric acid agonists (baclofen), opiates (morphine preparations with a regulated release; phentanyl patch), the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist amantadine, transdermally administered clonidine and locally applied lidocaine.
---------"The antinociceptive effect of moclobemide in mice is mediated by noradrenergic pathways."
Schreiber S, Getslev V, Weizman A, Pick CG.
Department of Psychiatry C, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Moclobemide is an antidepressant which affects the monoaminergic neurotransmitter system through a reversible inhibition of monoamine oxidase (MAO), preferentially type A. We examined the antinociceptive effects of moclobemide alone and in conjunction with specific opioid, adrenergic and serotonergic antagonists, using the mouse-tail flick test. Intraperitoneal moclobemide produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect with an ED50 of 69.1 mg/kg. Tests with selective antagonists yielded positive results only for yohimbine (P < 0.001), implying a noradrenergic mechanism of action in the moclobemide antinociceptive effect. This was confirmed by the coadministration of moclobemide with inactive doses of prototype agonists of the opioid, adrenergic and serotonergic systems. Only clonidine, an alpha2 agonist, significantly shifted (8-fold) the dose response curve of moclobemide. We conclude that there is a selective involvement of the alpha2 adrenergic pathways in the moclobemide-induced antinociceptive effect and a lesser involvement (if any) of the opioid, serotonergic and alpha1 adrenergic mechanisms. More research is needed to establish a possible role for moclobemide in pain management.
--------“Psychobiological Mechanisms of Resilience and Vulnerability: Inplications for Successful Adaptation to Extreme Stress”
by Dennis S. Charney (Am J Pschiatry 161:195-216, February 2004
Subjects with major depression are hyperresponsive to amphetamine such that the severity of depression in major depression was highly correlated with the rewarding effects of amphetamine. The mechanism may be depletion of synaptic dopamine with up-regulation of dopamine receptors (154, 155). Increasing dopamine function in the nucleus accumbens, the orbital frontal cortex, and the ventral tegmental area and NMDA receptor blockade in the nucleus accumbens and the medial prefrontal cortex may enhance sensitivity to reward. Therefore, psychostimulants, dopamine reuptake inhibitors, monoxamine oxidase-B inhibitors (selegiline), the dopamine receptor agonists (pramipexole), and NMDA receptor antagonists (memantine) may be useful for treating anhedonia and hopelessness resulting from traumatic stress exposure.
--------
"Effects of Chronic Tramadol on Pre- and Post-Synaptic Measures of Monoamine Functionby Hopwood SE, Owesson CA, Callado LF, McLaughlin DP, Stamford JA.
Academic Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, St Bartholomew's and The Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry,
Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, UK.
J Psychopharmacol 2001 Sep;15(3):147-53ABSTRACT
The atypical analgesic tramadol has strong structural similarities to the antidepressant venlafaxine and is a mixed noradrenaline (NA) and serotonin (5-HT) uptake inhibitor. Because tramadol has been found active in the forced swim test, a common predictor of antidepressant efficacy, we therefore examined the effects of chronic tramadol on various pre- and post-synaptic monoamine measures. Male Wistar rats (150-200 g) received tramadol (20 mg/kg i.p.) or vehicle for 21 days and were sacrificed 24 h after the last dose. Quantitative autoradiography revealed that specific frontocortical [3H]dihydroalprenolol and [3H]ketanserin binding was lower in the chronic tramadol group than controls (beta: 37+/-8 and 217+/-56 fmol/mg; 5-HT2A: 23+/-3 and 44+/-7 fmol/mg, respectively, p < 0.05). Chronic tramadol had no effect on the magnitude of electrically stimulated noradrenaline (NA) efflux or uptake in locus coeruleus (LC) slices. Although dexmedetomidine (10 nM) decreased LC NA efflux equally (by approximately 60%) in chronic tramadol and vehicle groups, desipramine (50 nM) increased LC NA efflux more in vehicle (to 164+/-7%) than tramadol-treated rats (144+/-6%; p < 0.05). Chronic tramadol had no effect on dorsal raphe (DRN) or median raphe (MRN) 5-HT efflux. However, 5-HT uptake in tramadol-treated rats was slower (p < 0.05) in MRN and nearly so (p = 0.055) in DRN. The selective 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT reduced 5-HT efflux in both DRN and MRN. Its effect in DRN was greater in rats given chronic tramadol than in vehicle controls (54+/-2 versus 32+/-6% reduction in 5-HT efflux, respectively). In conclusion, we suggest that tramadol has many of the pre- and postsynaptic neurochemical features of a conventional antidepressant, as might be predicted from its pharmacology. "-------
"Venlafaxine-tramadol similarities"
by
Markowitz JS, Patrick KS
Department of Pharmacy Practice,
Institute of Psychiatry,
Medical University of South Carolina,
Charleston 29425-0810, USA.
Med Hypotheses 1998 Aug; 51(2):167-8ABSTRACT
Venlafaxine and tramadol are relatively new compounds indicated for the treatment of depression and pain, respectively. These agents share a number of molecular and pharmacological features that may allow for broader and overlapping therapeutic indications for both drugs. Additionally, certain patient populations with coexisting depression and pain syndromes could potentially be treated with a single agent.---------
"The antinociceptive effect of tramadol-venlafaxine combination on the paw withdrawal threshold in a rat model of neuropathic pain."
Uyar M, Onal A, Uyar M, Dogru A, Soykan N.
Pain Clinic, Department of Anesthesiology, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey. meltem@med.ege.edu.tr
The combination of venlafaxine and tramadol was compared with the single use of these agents to investigate the antinociceptive effect on paw withdrawal latency (PWL) to paw pressure in rats with neuropathic pain. Rats were divided into 4 groups: group 1 received saline (0.2 ml i.p.); group 2 received venlafaxine (22 mg/kg i.p.); group 3 received tramadol (20 mg/kg i.p.); and group 4 received venlafaxine + tramadol. No statistically significant changes were observed in the saline and venlafaxine groups with respect to PWL in the lesioned paw. However, tramadol produced a significant antinociceptive effect on the lesioned paw at 30 min compared with the saline and venlafaxine groups. A more potent antinociceptive effect was observed in the tramadol + venlafaxine group, beginning at 60 min and lasting for 1 h. The combination of venlafaxine + tramadol was more effective in increasing the pain threshold in this animal model of neuropathic pain than either of these drugs administered alone. (c) 2003 Prous Science. All rights reserved.
----------
"Venlafaxine and mirtazapine: different mechanisms of antidepressant action, common opioid-mediated antinociceptive effects--a possible opioid involvement in severe depression?"
Schreiber S, Bleich A, Pick CG.
Department of Psychiatry, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Israel.
The efficacy of each antidepressant available has been found equal to that of amitriptyline in double-blind studies as far as mild to moderate depression is involved. However, it seems that some antidepressants are more effective than others in the treatment of severe types of depression (i.e., delusional depression and refractory depression). Following studies regarding the antinociceptive mechanisms of various antidepressants, we speculate that the involvement of the opioid system in the antidepressants' mechanism of action may be necessary, in order to prove effective in the treatment of severe depression. Among the antidepressants of the newer generations, that involvement occurs only with venlafaxine (a presynaptic drug which blocks the synaptosomal uptake of noradrenaline and serotonin and, to a lesser degree, of dopamine) and with mirtazapine (a postsynaptic drug which enhances noradrenergic and 5-HT1A-mediated serotonergic neurotransmission via antagonism of central alpha-auto- and hetero-adrenoreceptors). When mice were tested with a hotplate analgesia meter, both venlafaxine and mirtazapine induced a dose-dependent, naloxone-reversible antinociceptive effect following ip administration. Summing up the various interactions of venlafaxine and mirtazapine with opioid, noradrenergic and serotonergic agonists and antagonists, we found that the antinociceptive effect of venlafaxine is influenced by opioid receptor subtypes (mu-, kappa1- kappa3- and delta-opioid receptor subtypes) combined with the alpha2-adrenergic receptor, whereas the antinociceptive effect of mirtazapine mainly involves mu- and kappa3-opioid mechanisms. This opioid profile of the two drugs may be one of the explanations to their efficacy in severe depression, unlike the SSRIs and other antidepressants which lack opioid activity.
---------
"Serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors in animal models of pain."
Mochizucki D.
Asahi Kasei Pharma, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo, Japan. mochizucki.db@om.asahi-kasei.co.jp
Animal models of chronic pain serve as an experimental basis for testing new therapeutic interventions and for mechanistic investigations. In an animal model of chronic pain, based on the injection of formalin into the paw of a rodent, inhibitors of noradrenaline reuptake such as nisoxetine, nortriptyline and maprotiline and dual inhibitors of the noradrenaline and serotonin reuptake such as imipramine and milnacipran produce potent anti-nociceptive effects, whereas selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, such as fluvoxamine, are much less potent. In another model, neuropathic pain resulting from the chronic constriction injury of the sciatic nerve was prevented by the dual uptake inhibitor, venlafaxine. The experimental model involving ligation of the 5th spinal nerve induces behavioural signs in rats and mice that are similar to the symptoms of human neuropathic pain. In this model amitriptyline, a non-selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake blocker, the preferential noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, desipramine and the selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, milnacipran and duloxetine, produce a decrease in pain sensitivity whereas the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine, is ineffective. Antidepressants acting on the noradrenergic or both the noradrenergic and serotonergic systems thus appear to be more effective than those working on the serotonin system alone. 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
--------
"Treatment of pain syndromes with venlafaxine."
Grothe DR, Scheckner B, Albano D.
Global Medical Communications, Neuroscience, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Collegeville, Pennsylvania 19426, USA.
Major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxiety disorders such as generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are often accompanied by chronic painful symptoms. Examples of such symptoms are backache, headache, gastrointestinal pain, and joint pain. In addition, pain generally not associated with major depression or an anxiety disorder, such as peripheral neuropathic pain (e.g., diabetic neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia), cancer pain, and fibromyalgia, can be challenging for primary care providers to treat. Antidepressants that block reuptake of both serotonin and norepinephrine, such as the tricyclic antidepressants (e.g., amitriptyline), have been used to treat pain syndromes in patients with or without comorbid MDD or GAD. Venlafaxine, a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, has been safe and effective in animal models, healthy human volunteers, and patients for treatment of various pain syndromes. The use of venlafaxine for treatment of pain associated with MDD or GAD, neuropathic pain, headache, fibromyalgia, and postmastectomy pain syndrome is reviewed. Currently, no antidepressants, including venlafaxine, are approved for the treatment of chronic pain syndromes. Additional randomized, controlled trials are necessary to fully elucidate the role of venlafaxine in the treatment of chronic pain.
------------
"Synergistic antinociceptive effect of amitriptyline and morphine in the rat orofacial formalin test."
Luccarini P, Perrier L, Degoulange C, Gaydier AM, Dallel R.
Institut Universitaire de Technologie Genie Biologique, Universie d' Auvergne-Clermont I, Les Cezeaux, Aubiere, France.
BACKGROUND: Combination therapy is often used to increase the clinical utility of analgesic agents. The coadministration of two compounds may achieve analgesia at doses lower than those required for either compound alone, leading to enhanced pain relief and reduction of adverse effects. Herein, the authors describe the effect of coadministration of morphine and amitriptyline on cutaneous orofacial inflammatory pain in rats. METHODS: Amitriptyline, morphine, or the combination of amitriptyline and morphine was administered systemically to rats, and antinociceptive effects were determined by means of the rat orofacial formalin test. Isobolographic analysis was used to define the nature of the interactions between morphine and amitriptyline. RESULTS: Amitriptyline as well as morphine produced a dose-related inhibition in the first phase and the second phase of rubbing activity. ED50 values against rubbing behavior were 14.6 mg/kg (95% confidence interval, 10.2-33.5 mg/kg) and 1.3 mg/kg (95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.7 mg/kg) for amitriptyline and morphine, respectively. Combinations of increasing fractional increments of amitriptyline and morphine ED50 doses produced a synergistic effect against rubbing behavior, as revealed by isobolographic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that systemic amitriptyline and morphine synergistically inhibit cutaneous orofacial inflammatory pain in rats.
-----------
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00040261
Despite the availability of a wide range of antidepressant drugs, clinical trials indicate that 30% to 40% of patients with major depression fail to respond to first-line antidepressant treatment, despite adequate dosage, duration, and compliance. Thus, there is a clear need to develop novel and improved therapeutics for unipolar and bipolar depression. Recent preclinical studies suggest that antidepressants may exert delayed indirect effects on the glutamatergic system. Furthermore, a growing body of data suggests that mood disorders are associated with regional volumetric reductions, and cell loss and atrophy. It is thus noteworthy that lamotrigine, which, among other effects reduces glutamate release, has antidepressant effects, and a pilot study has suggested that NMDA antagonists may have antidepressant effects. Together, this data suggests that the glutamatergic system may play a role in the pathophysiology and treatment of depression, and that agents, which more directly reduce glutamatergic neurotransmission, may represent a novel class of antidepressants.
Memantine (Akatinol memantine), an agent that is approved in Germany for dementia syndrome, Parkinson's disease has significant antiglutamatergic and neuroprotective properties, may prove to have antidepressant properties in depressed patients. In this study, we propose to investigate the potential efficacy of memantine, an agent which reduces glutamatergic output via open-channel block of the NMDA receptor-associated ion channel. Most importantly, memantine only blocks the channel during periods of abnormal, excessive activity, and leaves relatively spared normal neurotransmission. This finding is the basis for the minimal side effect profile displayed by memantine.
poster:JackD
thread:430919
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20050108/msgs/441147.html