Posted by SLS on March 11, 2006, at 13:13:38
In reply to Re: Ed - here's why you are wrong » Michael Bell, posted by ed_uk on March 11, 2006, at 12:42:31
> >Finally, have you taken new and old Nardil Ed? What are you basing your observations on?
> No, I do not take Nardil. I am basing my statements on simple logic.And accurate information, I'm sure.
:-)
I guess we'll have to wait and see how this thing plays out in real life. Perhaps a higher peak blood concentration is necessary for optimal tissue absorption, in which case the old Nardil would be more effective at equivalent dosages.
Remember, any small difference in tissue absorption would be magnified because Nardil inhibits its own metabolism.
Just more logic?
:-)
I'm not sure what I'm talking about. I wish I were. This is an important topic. If doctors do not take into consideration a possible difference in bioequivalency between the two preparations, he might terminate a trial prematurely.
- Scott
poster:SLS
thread:614817
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060310/msgs/618881.html