Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Ed - here's why you are wrong

Posted by SLS on March 11, 2006, at 13:13:38

In reply to Re: Ed - here's why you are wrong » Michael Bell, posted by ed_uk on March 11, 2006, at 12:42:31

> >Finally, have you taken new and old Nardil Ed? What are you basing your observations on?

> No, I do not take Nardil. I am basing my statements on simple logic.

And accurate information, I'm sure.

:-)

I guess we'll have to wait and see how this thing plays out in real life. Perhaps a higher peak blood concentration is necessary for optimal tissue absorption, in which case the old Nardil would be more effective at equivalent dosages.

Remember, any small difference in tissue absorption would be magnified because Nardil inhibits its own metabolism.

Just more logic?

:-)

I'm not sure what I'm talking about. I wish I were. This is an important topic. If doctors do not take into consideration a possible difference in bioequivalency between the two preparations, he might terminate a trial prematurely.


- Scott

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:SLS thread:614817
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060310/msgs/618881.html