Re: Ed - here's why you are wrong » SLS

Posted by ed_uk on March 11, 2006, at 14:42:29

In reply to Re: Ed - here's why you are wrong, posted by SLS on March 11, 2006, at 13:13:38

Hi Scott
> If doctors do not take into consideration a possible difference in bioequivalency between the two preparations, he might terminate a trial prematurely.
That's very true. It may be necessary to adjust......
1. The total daily dose
2. The size of each individual dose
3. The interval/time between doses
3. The number of doses per day
Regards
Ed

Thread

I Like and Believe In This Med For Whatever Condit Phillipa 3/1/06
...
Re: The 'new' Nardil forgetful mary 3/7/06
Re: The 'new' Nardil » ed_uk Chairman_MAO 3/8/06
Re: The 'new' Nardil » ed_uk Chairman_MAO 3/8/06
Re: The 'new' Nardil » Chairman_MAO ed_uk 3/8/06
Re: The 'new' Nardil ed_uk 3/8/06
Re: The 'new' Nardil » ed_uk Chairman_MAO 3/8/06
New Nardil - Ed, read this. Michael Bell 3/10/06
Re: New Nardil - Ed, read this. » Michael Bell ed_uk 3/10/06
Re: New Nardil - Ed, read this. forgetful mary 3/10/06
Ed - here's why you are wrong » ed_uk Michael Bell 3/11/06
Re: Ed - here's why you are wrong » Michael Bell ed_uk 3/11/06
Re: Ed - here's why you are wrong SLS 3/11/06
Re: Ed - here's why you are wrong » SLS ed_uk 3/11/06
Re: Ed - here's why you are wrong forgetful mary 3/11/06
Re: New Nardil - Ed, read this. » Michael Bell Chairman_MAO 3/12/06
Re: New Nardil - Ed, read this. » Chairman_MAO Questionmark 3/12/06
Re: Ed - here's why you are wrong » forgetful mary ed_uk 3/12/06

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:ed_uk thread:614817
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060310/msgs/618926.html

	for
in