Posted by Honore on June 28, 2007, at 23:55:35
In reply to Re: Nothing suggests Vitamin b destroys Nardil » Honore, posted by FredPotter on June 28, 2007, at 23:41:13
The context makes it totally clear that the discussion is about Vitamin B-6 deficiency.
It simply is what that article is about. Whatever the imprecision of the sentence, in establishing the reversibility of the relationship, it's not what the sentence is about, or what anything in the article is about.
Have you looked at the articed cited, in GWA's post prior to mine? Look at it, and then tell me that you think the sentence could possibly be taken to mean that vitamin B6 in any way affects nardil.
We can discuss it better if you look at the beginning of the article, where the abstract and this sentence occur.
Honore
poster:Honore
thread:765488
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20070622/msgs/766606.html