Posted by Lou Pilder on April 22, 2015, at 12:30:21
In reply to Lou's reply-nverehnny » 10derheart, posted by Lou Pilder on April 22, 2015, at 12:05:42
> > >>Be advised former deputy, that just because you say that you could ignore my pleas to sanction the anti-Semitic propaganda here then as a deputy, there is also the fact that readers could think that you could have sanctioned those statements if you wanted to.
> >
> > Since there was never any anti-Semitic propaganda here, I think I might be okay.
> >
> > STOP threatening me.
> > STOP accusing me.
> > STOP repeating yourself.
> > STOP mentioning deputies in the present tense when there have been ZERO for years.
> > STOP stating your opinion as a fact (see above)
> > STOP overwhelming all the threads.
> >
> > just stop.
> > and I hope that readers don't wonder anything about anything I just said or you just said because that would mean they had to read this exchange, which I wouldn't wish on anyone.
> >
> > even myself.
> >
> > stop
> > stop
> > stop
> > stop
> > stop
> > stop
> > stop
>
> Friends,
> It is written here that there was never any anti-Semitic propaganda here.
> In order to understand a lot of what has been posted here against the Jews that is allowed to be seen as supportive, readers be advised that Mr. Hsiung says that if something is not sanctioned, then readers could think that it is not against his rules here. And worse, that if there is something standing that is against his rules, he can allow it to be seen as supportive because by it being seen that way, it will be good in his thinking for the community as a whole. And even worse, he asks readers to try to trust him in that, and that means that any anti-Semitic propaganda seen here unsanctioned will be good, in Mr. Hsiung's thinking, to be good for this community as a whole.
> Now in order for antisemitic propaganda, which puts down or accuses Jews, that is allowed to be seen as supportive, means that nothing is done by either Mr. Hsiung or any of his deputies of record to the statement in question. By the allowing by Mr. Hsiung and all those deputies that have a notification system that they say they are sure to get, to have anti-Semitic propaganda, that could seriously misrepresent the mission of the forum that is for support and education, as being supportive takes precedence according to Mr. Hsiung. The justification put forth by Mr. Hsiung to allow what is not supportive to be seen as being supportive as lacking any sanction to the anti-Semitic propaganda, is that in Mr. Hsiung's thinking it will be good for this community as a whole for it to be seen that way, or even worse, that his {degree of concern} is not enough to sanction the anti-Semitic propaganda for he also states that he thinks that the outcome from readers seeing the anti-Semitic propaganda as supportive here, is unlikely. He has not posted what he bases that thinking of his on as of yet, and I am awaiting for him to post his rationale for making that claim. This could mean to a subset of readers that even if anti-Semitism is spread from this site on the basis that readers could see anti-Semitic propaganda un sanctioned here, he is going to allow it anyway, and his deputies of record in concert with him because Mr. Hsiung states that any action, or inaction, comes from all of "us", which is him and his deputies of record. But to understand how this has been done, and is continuing to be done, because the anti-Semitic propaganda is still standing,we could look at the following. To see this bring up Google and type in:
> [Jewish deicide, Wikipedia ]
> Then with that background, I will show you more of the anti-Semitic propaganda that is allowed to be seen here as being civil.
> LouFriends,
Now if you have read the previous article from Wikipedia, let us go further and bring up Google and type in:
[parts of the bible, part 6, anti-Semitism ]
Could be first by Robert Neilson
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1077523
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20150407/msgs/1078418.html