Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: EMSAM stronger than oral selegline » notfred

Posted by Jakeman on June 15, 2006, at 1:22:28

In reply to Re: EMSAM stronger than oral selegline, posted by notfred on June 14, 2006, at 17:50:40

>
> >
> > b. MAO-A inhibition is what produces antidepressant efficacy
>

Other studies have shown that antidepressant efficacy for transdermal selelinge is provided at lower doses(6 mg) See below. Which may indicate that transdermal delivery has a stronger effect. Maybe its hitting both A and B. I don't know.

http://www.rxlist.com/cgi/generic4/emsam_cp.htm
Clinical Efficacy Trials

The efficacy of EMSAM as a treatment for major depressive disorder was established in two placebo-controlled studies of six and eight weeks duration in adult outpatients (ages 18 to 70 years) meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder. In both studies, patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with EMSAM or placebo. The 6-week trial (N=176) showed that EMSAM 6mg/24hours was significantly more effective than placebo on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). In an 8-week dose titration trial, depressed patients (N=265), who received EMSAM or placebo at a starting dose of 6mg/24hours, with possible increases to 9mg/24hours or 12mg/24hours based on clinical response, showed significant improvement compared with placebo on the primary outcome measure, the 28-item HAM-D total score.

In another trial, 322 patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder who had responded during an initial 10-week open-label treatment phase for about 25 days, on average, to EMSAM 6mg/24hours, were randomized either to continuation of EMSAM at the same dose (N=159) or to placebo (N=163) under double-blind conditions for observation of relapse. About 52% of the EMSAM-treated patients, as well as about 52% of the placebo-treated patients, had discontinued treatment by week 12 of the double-blind phase. Response during the open-label phase was defined as 17-item HAM-D score <10 at either week 8 or 9 and at week 10 of the open-label phase. Relapse during the double-blind phase was defined as follows : (1) a 17-item HAM-D score ³ 14, (2) a CGI-S score of ³ 3 (with at least a 2-point increase from double-blind baseline), and (3) meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder on two consecutive visits ³ 11 days apart. In the double-blind phase, patients receiving continued EMSAM experienced a significantly longer time to relapse


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:Jakeman thread:655515
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060610/msgs/657149.html