![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 10 to 34 of 38. Go back in thread:
Posted by jdgjdg on March 4, 2004, at 22:55:21
In reply to women without children, posted by terrics on March 4, 2004, at 15:16:10
Wow, that is an interesting question. I am 29 myself and have no children. I don't believe it has anything to do with my selfishness or mental state. Many single women choose to finish their education and build a solid financial base before having children. I am 29 years old, have a master's degree, own my own home, and have a "nest-egg". This does not mean I am any more selfish and or mentally unstable than women my age who have children. If anything, I believe women who choose to have children before becoming emotionally, mentally, and financially secure are the ones who should think about their mental health.
Posted by jdgjdg on March 4, 2004, at 22:58:36
In reply to Re: women without children, posted by Miss Honeychurch on March 4, 2004, at 15:51:05
I don't think you are biologically flawed because you don't want children. You don't have to have children just because you are a woman. I admire you for not having children because society thinks you should. Jenn
Posted by All Done on March 5, 2004, at 0:35:43
In reply to women without children, posted by terrics on March 4, 2004, at 15:16:10
> Do any of you think that women who have no kids are more self centered and have more time to dwell on their mental health? Or perhaps they have no kids because their mental health is so flawed? If anyone here is a little older and childless I would really like to hear from you. I would also like to hear all comments from everyone; female, male, childless or not.
I don't necessarily know or believe that these two things, mental health and the decision to have or not have children, are related. That said, I will say that I worry/dwell on my mental health much more now than before I had my son. I need to be as healthy as I can be in order to take care of him and sometimes it's really difficult and I struggle.
Incidentally, I think the women I know that are childless by their own decision are some of the emotionally healthiest people. One gave a child up for adoption because she did not feel she was ready in many ways to raise a child. I think she is one of the most selfless people I've ever known. Another friend of mine chose not to have children and focus on her career. I believe this took a great deal of self-awareness on her part to make this decision.
Posted by missamor on March 5, 2004, at 0:49:12
In reply to Re: women without children » terrics, posted by All Done on March 5, 2004, at 0:35:43
i am in my mid 20's and have given the subject thought as well. i think my mothers generation had less options as far as choosing to be a mother or not. it seemed more their "american duty" or something. the reason less women are having babies is a result of many things.i think it has somewhat to do with a persons mental health, somewhat to do with selfishness in some cases, some simply do not want kids. but for whatever reason the world is working. i do not think it is every womans inherent duty to reproduce. there are plenty of women without children that spend their lives and energy in a very healthy productive manner. they add something to the world, and some woman can offer beautiful children to the world, which is essential as well. in my opinion when you are doing what is right for you it is easier, when you are not where you should be you constantly have battles to overcome. i guess my point is if we each live our lives, and are the strongest and bravest we can be (whether we bear children or not) we have added something needed and specail to the world. a child doesnt wont automatically fulfill any womans sense of existance. thats her job-
"don't compromise yourself. you're all you got."
~janis joplin
Posted by Dinah on March 5, 2004, at 0:55:24
In reply to Re: women without children » terrics, posted by All Done on March 5, 2004, at 0:35:43
Excellent point. A lack of selfishness in having or not having children comes from putting the welfare of the child before your own desires. Which could lead to a decision not to have a child as easily as a decision to have one.
I am so glad I waited until I was in my mid thirties. I would have been an awful Mom in my twenties.
Posted by tinydancer on March 5, 2004, at 1:48:57
In reply to women without children, posted by terrics on March 4, 2004, at 15:16:10
I have one child who was concieved when I was a teenager and the prevention method failed.
I have never though of women, men or married couples as being self centered in any way. The choice to have children or not have children is incredibly individual with enormous reasonings behind it. I also have never thought of mental illness as being a reason to discourage having a child. Even with a mental illness that doesn't mean one cannot be a loving parent, although one would have to evaluate one's ability to care for a child if they were often unable to function due to the mental illness.
I think having a child is a very serious responsibility and I applaud men and women who choose to wait to have children or not at all-that means they understand the responsibility and take it seriously.
For me, being pregnant was the most wonderful time of my life, when somehow my hormones tricked my brain into thinking I was no longer mentally ill. I struggle a lot being a mother but my will to live and desire to achieve something is made so much stronger by having a little one to look after. I would love to have more children but I don't know when I will be in a stable place to be able to again.
Posted by rainyday on March 5, 2004, at 7:32:02
In reply to Re: women without children, posted by tinydancer on March 5, 2004, at 1:48:57
I decided not to have children because my family is (I perceive) so dysfunctional that I did not want to perpetuate that particular gene pool. My older sister also chose not to have children (we never discussed our decisions until recently and she felt exactly the same). Both our brothers have kids. I am 42 years old and don't regret my decision - now because I'm in such a sorry state I can't take care of myself very well and couldn't fathom being responsible for another person too.
Posted by Crooked Heart on March 5, 2004, at 7:32:30
In reply to women without children, posted by terrics on March 4, 2004, at 15:16:10
> Do any of you think that women who have no kids are more self centered and have more time to dwell on their mental health? Or perhaps they have no kids because their mental health is so flawed?
hi terrics
No when I look around at all the people I know, there's just as much 'self-centredness' amongst those with children as those without! Also some of the most generous-spirited individuals I've ever come across have had no children. I can't see a link between mental health and having children either.I'm just glad that younger women nowadays seeem to be generally much less defensive about a decision not to have children.
Posted by terrics on March 5, 2004, at 18:28:16
In reply to Re: women without children » terrics, posted by Crooked Heart on March 5, 2004, at 7:32:30
Thank you all for such interesting comments. I do not have children and I agree that it does not make one particularly self-centered. I did worry about having children because of my mental health and my ability to take care of them. terrics
Posted by jdgjdg on March 5, 2004, at 20:25:17
In reply to Re: women without children, posted by terrics on March 5, 2004, at 18:28:16
Terrics, I applaud you for realizing that you may not be ready to have children yet. If you really want children(as I do someday), the time will come when you are ready. Jenn
Posted by Crooked Heart on March 6, 2004, at 6:02:38
In reply to Re: women without children, posted by terrics on March 5, 2004, at 18:28:16
> Thank you all for such interesting comments. I do not have children and I agree that it does not make one particularly self-centered. I did worry about having children because of my mental health and my ability to take care of them. terrics
I wish that my mother had felt that worry. All of my sibs as well as myself suffered a lot because of my mother's inability to look after us. The effects on us are still there decades later, although therapy has helped me a lot. It always felt that it was up to us to make her happy, but no matter how hard they try children can't cure their mother's clinical depression.
And now I suppose we do our duty towards our mother but you couldn't say that any of us are really fond of her. It's nobody's fault but it is a shame.
It's a courageous and generous decision not to have children because one felt that one might not be able to look after them properly.
Posted by confetti on March 6, 2004, at 13:51:29
In reply to women without children, posted by terrics on March 4, 2004, at 15:16:10
I never felt I had the energy to take care of myself, much less a child. When a baby/child screams or cries, it sends a lightning bolt through my whole system.
I've never felt weird for not having children. Other people are very good at making me feel that way though.
Posted by terrics on March 6, 2004, at 16:17:34
In reply to Re: women without children, posted by jdgjdg on March 5, 2004, at 20:25:17
thank you so much for your kind thought, but my child bearing days are long over. terrics
Posted by terrics on March 6, 2004, at 16:20:37
In reply to Re: women without children, posted by confetti on March 6, 2004, at 13:51:29
I don't feel weird either. Sometimes I feel sad though. I could not have taken care of kids. terrics
Posted by noa on March 6, 2004, at 20:03:36
In reply to women without children, posted by terrics on March 4, 2004, at 15:16:10
I'm in my forties and no children. I have always wanted to have children "someday". Then, in my thirties, depression hit hard and by the time I recovered I was in my forties! I think about having children, but still feel my life isn't stable enough for it--in many ways--emotionally, financially, being single, etc. etc.
This is a very very sad topic for me. I feel terrible loss about this. Maybe "someday" I will be able to adopt a child. The time for bearing my own is likely to be passed or nearly so, and I am not ready to rush into the process right now.
I try not to spend too much time dwelling on MH now that I'm doing better. When I was not doing well, it wasn't really a matter of dwelling on it, but the depression was really rather debilitating. The hypothetical question about whether I would have suffered depression that bad if I had been caring for a child or children? Who knows. I do usually feel better when around children and when I have to care for them, it is easier to be motivated than when just taking care of myself. But on the other hand, the depression also had the strong biological component and I think about how that would have affected my availablity if there had been a child in my life. I also was even less in a position to support a child anyway.
Well, all that is rather moot.
Since part of my life dream was someday having a family, when I came out of the coma of depression after a decade, I realized that at this stage of life, I might have to change what my life dreams are. This is very difficult. I'm left feeling at a loss--kind of "now what?"--and a loss for all the time and all those potentially childbearing years.
I definitly try not to dwell too much on all of this, either. But it comes to mind in one way or another almost every day. When it comes to mind, I usually only think about it breifly, and then put it aside.
Posted by noa on March 6, 2004, at 20:08:58
In reply to Re: women without children, posted by shortelise on March 4, 2004, at 16:17:40
The idea that not having kids is somehow selfish seems strange to me, too. I think it is rooted in older traditional society ideas of what a family is for that no longer apply.
People choose to have kids or not have kids for so many different reasons. Selfishness seems to me to just not be a relevant word in the matter.
BTW, there is a trend to use the word "child-free" rather than "childless", according to an article I read last year about couples who choose not to have children.
Posted by noa on March 6, 2004, at 20:11:35
In reply to Re: women without children, posted by justyourlaugh on March 4, 2004, at 22:38:08
>i have kids...
they are not my distraction from self.
they are myself..
j
This is a beautiful haiku, and I know it is authentically you, jyl.
Posted by gardenergirl on March 6, 2004, at 22:09:56
In reply to Re: women without children » terrics, posted by noa on March 6, 2004, at 20:03:36
Posted by terrics on March 7, 2004, at 11:22:51
In reply to Re: women without children » terrics, posted by noa on March 6, 2004, at 20:03:36
Sorry this is a painful topic. I do understand. Maybe adoption is a good idea when you are ready. Glad you are doing better with MH. terrics
Posted by noa on March 7, 2004, at 12:23:28
In reply to Re: women without children » noa, posted by terrics on March 7, 2004, at 11:22:51
Thanks, terrics and gg.
Terrics, I think it was a great thread you started.
It's good for me to 'discuss' the issue. Usually, I try to avoid thinking about it.
Posted by Pfinstegg on March 7, 2004, at 22:58:34
In reply to Re: women without children, posted by noa on March 7, 2004, at 12:23:28
I feel very respectful of all the views expressed here- whether of not wanting children, of not feeling well enough to care for them, or of regret that the time may have passed. To speak briefly about the positive aspects of having a child-I waited until I felt well enough to have my one child- and found, to my amazement, that nurturing him helped me fill in the huge hole in my heart from having had a non-nurturing, mentally ill mother. I felt that everything I gave him was something I was also somehow giving myself. I don't think there's a harder job in the world than being a parent, but like all the hardest things, there are such precious and meaningful parts to it. I don't think I could have managed more than one child, though.
For the women, like Noa, perhaps, who have some regrets, I'd suggest not feeling too pessimistic yet. People can give birth much later now than they used to be able to- for example, Sen. Edwards' wife, who has a 2 year old and a 4-year old at age 54 (with medical help of an unspecified kind!). I have a friend who was childless until age 53, and who now has three adopted children from the Ukraine. She's working and supporting them, coping with the attachment problems arising from the fact that they all came from an orphanage, and bit by bit, they are all forming a healthy, even if unusual, family. She had previously weathered two divorces and a severe bout of depression. I admire her so much for finally doing what she really wanted.
But to go back to the other side of the question - there are so many ways to live a full, meaningful life, even when one has to battle an emotional illness. Becoming one's truest self, using some of our gifts and talents both to fulfill ourselves, and to make a small contribution to the world, and making connections to others (perhaps just one or two others) are at least as important as having children- probably more so.
Posted by Crooked Heart on March 8, 2004, at 8:40:08
In reply to Re: women without children, posted by Pfinstegg on March 7, 2004, at 22:58:34
>- there are so many ways to live a full, meaningful life, even when one has to battle an emotional illness. Becoming one's truest self, using some of our gifts and talents both to fulfill ourselves, and to make a small contribution to the world, and making connections to others (perhaps just one or two others)...
>
>That expresses so well how I feel, increasingly, as I get older (and maybe therapy is still working!). Sometimes I would look back and think how much better I could have done in this world in every way if it hadn't been for the s**t that was dumped upon me much too early (well from birth in fact). Now I can't be bothered with that, the bad stuff happened, there were things I couldn't do, but I don't want to let it go on diminishing my life.
And the little things, the connections, the (imperfect) relationships, small actions, activities unimportant in the big scheme of things, OK so they're not going to set the world on fire, but they feel worthwhile and important to me.
Posted by sienna on March 9, 2004, at 18:18:02
In reply to Re: women without children » terrics, posted by noa on March 6, 2004, at 20:03:36
I am 29 and my heart is breaking to have a family and children. I have so much love to give. But when i put my love into the world the world just takes it from me and slaps me in the face.
Sienna
Posted by Pfinstegg on March 9, 2004, at 18:46:07
In reply to Re: women without children, posted by sienna on March 9, 2004, at 18:18:02
Oh Sienna, that's a heart-breaking feeling. You're in therapy, aren't you? That should bring more self-confidence, gradually, and help eliminate any unconscious barriers to finding the right guy for you. You have at least ten years, maybe fifteen, before you would need to think about the alternatives that my friend eventually chose.
Posted by sienna on March 9, 2004, at 19:57:15
In reply to Re: women without children » sienna, posted by Pfinstegg on March 9, 2004, at 18:46:07
hi,
actually no im not in therapy really anymore. i see my social worker every six weeks or so. Actually lately more like every two or three months, but i will see her next week sometime.
I dont know what is wrong with me. I am broken inside. i cant even eat. my boyfriend and i broke up yesterday.
mishka
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Psychology | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.